Review: The Martian

the_martian_coverI need to reread the end of Andy Weir’s The Martian. It kept me up late on a work night. Around 1:00am, I decided to start skimming or else I’d risk falling asleep at work. The timer on my Kindle said there was approximately 45 minutes remaining and I hesitated. The train portion of my commute is roughly 45 minutes so I thought: Perfect. I can finish on the train now. Then I thought: I can’t wait until I’m on the train. What if I can’t read then? Sometimes Metro is too packed to hold a Kindle. This book could not wait.

The Martian is primarily given in first-person narration and long segments are presented as Mark Watney’s log book to chronicle his time on Mars. His mission was scrubbed after a fierce windstorm blew up. He was injured in the storm, but his crew believed he was dead and left without him. Mark isn’t bitter about this; he knows his crew had good reason to think he’d died and remains cautiously hopeful. If he can survive the next four years, he can catch a ride home with the next Ares mission.

Fortunately, Mark is a botanist and engineer. He was sent with a small amount of bacteria-rich dirt from Earth and seeds to test whether anything can be grown. NASA also sent whole potatoes for the crew to prepare themselves a real Thanksgiving dinner. Alone, Mark chops and plants these potatoes, building a little farm inside his habitat. I know some reviewers disliked the longer, technical passages, but these sections were my favorite. I loved seeing how his mind worked to solve a growing list of problems: how to find increased surface area for his potato farm, how to increase his supply of dirt, how to maximize his potatoes, how to make water, oxygen, and CO2, on and on. Nothing on Mars is simple or easy.

The technical passages are also necessary to bolster the occasional dumbed-down portions. Some lines are written in such a way as to both insult the reader and lower the presumed intelligence of the narrator:

I stumbled up the hill toward the Hab. As I crested the rise, I saw something that made me very happy and something that made me very sad: The Hab was inact (yay!) and the MAV was gone (boo!). (6)

What an awful use of parentheticals! It’s like he forgot that he already explained the functions of the Hab and MAV and doesn’t trust the reader to sort out the implications. It wasn’t until he started up with the math/chemistry/farm talk that I felt comfortable taking him seriously. It’s a real skill to make chemistry understandable to a layman. Mark explains his math without sounding like he’s talking down to the reader by saying things like: I can get x amount of water this way, which is half of what I’ll need… Even if you don’t understand the numbers he’s throwing around, you can still appreciate what they mean for his situation.

Mark is also quite funny:

As usual, I’m working with stuff that was deliberately designed not to burn. But no amount of careful design by NASA can get around a determined arsonist with a tank of pure oxygen. (160)

It’s impossible to not love him a little. He’s endlessly clever and inventive. He remains in good spirits, even when it doesn’t make sense for him to be. He could have had many sad-sack, hopeless moments without risk of becoming a Debbie Downer. The seriousness of the situation and his natural humor buy him a lot of reader patience, but it’s just not a depressing sort of book. It’s about discovery and the inherent excitement of space travel:

Everywhere I go, I’m the first. Step outside the rover? First guy ever to be there! Climb a hill? First guy to climb that hill! Kick a rock? That rock hasn’t moved in a million years! (99)

Overall: 4.5 I wanted the end to be more… Also, there are a couple weird sections that skip to an outside perspective, like that of a camera, and some of these work better than others. The scenes with Mark on Mars are the best; the rest feel like their dialog has been pulled from every sci-fi movie ever.

Translation: READ IT. Start it early though. Me and the husband were both up til 1:30 on a work/school night and the next day was rough.

7 thoughts on “Review: The Martian

  1. Great review but…only 4.5?!? A harsh judgement! I nearly had to create a sixth star just for this one. I love Mark so much – gorgeous, funny, heroic. Aaaah! Mark! πŸ˜‰

    Joking aside, I just loved the fact that this book was so uncomplicatedly fun. It reminded me of the adventure books of yore, when no-one got depressed or angsty, or obsessed about feelings. I wouldn’t want every book to be like that, but I felt as if I’d had a little holiday reading this one – a holiday on Mars!

    • Lol. This is what makes me crazy about numerical reviews! I want to give top marks to Mark’s sections, but not to the non-Mars bits. It’s fun to see NASA in problem-solving mode, but the characters in these sections were so much less compelling. There was a thing about the ending that really bugged me too (hence my excitement about a possible spoiler side to my site). As for Mark himself: he definitely earns an extra star. No question! πŸ˜‰

      I loved the lack of depression and angst too. It would have been easy for this book to collapse into an introspective on loneliness/despair/etc, but it doesn’t. I was impressed by how Weir made Mark’s situation feel desperate without a losing the feel of an old school adventure.

      • Coincidentally I’d read two or three factual books about NASA missions round about the same time as I read The Martian, and I think that made me appreciate the NASA scenes more, becuase they read as very well researched and authentic. I agree about the characters though – I don’t really remember any of them now.

        You’ll need to get the spoiler thing up and running, ‘cos I really want to know what bugged you so much about the ending…

        • I found the NASA scenes believable enough, it was just the characters. Like you, I don’t recall any of their names. They felt like a collection of nerdy stereotypes and I had no real sense of them.

          I’m a little worried to say what I think of the ending if I’m already in trouble for giving a “low” 4.5! πŸ™‚

  2. Two things: 1) This was my favorite book of last year, hands down; and 2) Weir has stated in interviews that he considered the fact that, realistically, there’s no way Mark would not have succumbed to depression for at least SOME of his time on Mars, and deliberately decided to disregard that fact. It’s a choice I can stand behind, I think.

    • It’s interesting to know that Weir gave real consideration to the depression angle. If he had dwelt on it, the book would have been different—not only in terms of “realism,” but with respect to Mark’s character. Since Mark knew the log would be found and read, he had a choice: he could be the guy who wrote about despair, or the guy who wrote about being a space pirate. πŸ™‚ Also, I thought of his writing style as being reflective of his effort to stay sane/hopeful.

      If any readers get in a real twist about Mark’s lack of despondency, it’s easy enough to say he was depressed on the days left out of the log. Sidenote: keeping any kind of log/journal while depressed is a bad idea. I get so embarrassed when I look through my journals and see a random sad-sack rant.

      Thanks for reading and commenting!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s